{"id":1238,"date":"2017-08-03T09:13:17","date_gmt":"2017-08-03T13:13:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peopros.com\/index.php\/?p=1238"},"modified":"2017-08-03T09:13:17","modified_gmt":"2017-08-03T13:13:17","slug":"workers-comp-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/peopros.com\/index.php\/workers-comp-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Workers’ Comp Update"},"content":{"rendered":"

Master Workers’ Comp Policies for PEOs and Staffing Companies<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>W<\/big>orkers’ Compensation coverage continues to be a big problem for startup PEOs and staffing companies. In certain states (California, for example), it is nearly impossible to find a carrier willing to take a chance on a startup operation.<\/p>\n

“The staffing industry is particularly tough.” agent Will Tenney tells us. “Carriers that would have a look before have closed their eyes. The rising cost of claims is causing insurers to exercise extreme caution with untested staffing and PEO companies.”<\/p>\n

The business has always been cyclic in nature, and it appears that a downturn is due.<\/p>\n

What Changed?<\/b>
\nThe comp industry is best described as “long tailed.” Incidents and occurrences that happened 6 to 8 years ago are still showing a large effect. In states like California and New York, the policies of “employee first” are starting to show costs. The practice of “pay first, investigate later” is taking it’s toll on carrier surplus, and claims reserves are rising throughout the industry.<\/p>\n

A spokesperson from a national carrier with a large PEO\/staffing presence told us, “It’s not that PEOs and Staffing companies have a higher incidence of claims. That seems to be a level playing field. However, the process of resolving them can take longer when dealing with high deductible policies. Hence, the reserves build up and are held for a longer period of time. This makes taking on a startup PEO or staffing company a much riskier proposition to the actuaries.”<\/p>\n

Is There an Upswing Coming?<\/b>
\nThe answer most given is “too soon to tell.” The wave of optimism sweeping the industry with a conservative administration is there, but many are waiting for that “long tail” to pull through.<\/p>\n

What Can a Startup Do?<\/b>
\nPEO Pros has been challenged by this dilemma. Clients have been advised to seek out a state fund \/ assigned risk situation to develop some history (at least three years.) This makes them much more attractive to a carrier.<\/p>\n

Why Does Three Years History Help?<\/b>
\nWhen a carrier takes the risk of underwriting a PEO or staffing firm, the potential downside can be very large. Consider a standard $250K high deductible policy. Should the PEO or staffing firm go under the carrier is then responsible for all the claims and associated expenses. Collateral helps, but doesn’t cover it all except in rare cases. The legal costs alone usually eat through collateral in a rapid fashion.<\/p>\n

The actuaries prefer to have an established “book of business” to study, to predict performance by studying trends, and the three year (minimum) history.<\/p>\n

Why Can’t We Grow Organically?<\/b>
\nPEO Pros tells us: “We get asked this all the time. The startup wants to know what they can write and they will go find it. It sounds like a perfectly good business plan until you see the actuary’s side of it. They have no history, no performance metrics or industry trends to study. It is difficult to make a decision in a vacuum.”<\/p>\n

Certainly, an established firm can continue to grow organically, but the initial approval is going to require a measurable book of business.<\/p>\n

This is frustrating to startups. PEO Pros relates to us: “We often hear the complaints from the startup firms with words to the effect of ‘How are we supposed to start a business?’. It is frustrating to us as well, as we want to help. It is not a pleasant feeling, advising someone to go to a state fund to get three years experience first.”<\/p>\n

What Can a Startup Do to Enhance Our Prospects?<\/b>
\nThere are a few things you can do to make your submission more attractive:<\/p>\n